|
|
IRS may recharacterize dividend payments to S shareholder-employee as wages
Watson, P.C. v. U.S., (DC IA 12/23/10) 107 AFTR 2d ¶2011-305
A district court has concluded that an S corporation shareholder-employee’s $24,000 salary in 2002 and 2003 was unreasonably low, and allowed IRS to reclassify as salary over $67,000 in dividend payments to the officer during each of those years. The corporation will also owe employment taxes on the reclassified dividend payments.
RIA observation: This is a long standing compliance issue with IRS, which feels that many service professionals try to minimize Medicare and Social Security taxes by routing what would otherwise be self-employment income through an S corporation and then paying themselves a nominal salary. Since the amount of compensation that an S corporation pays its employee-shareholder is within the employee-shareholder’s discretion, he may have an incentive to claim less than a reasonable salary and take from the S corporation other payments (e.g., dividends) that aren’t subject to employment taxes.
RIA observation: In 2010, the House but not the Senate passed legislation that included a crackdown on service professionals who try to minimize Medicare and Social Security taxes by routing their self-employment income through an S corporation and then paying themselves a nominal salary (see Federal Taxes Weekly Alert 06/03/2010).
Facts. David E. Watson had a bachelor’s degree in business administration and a specialization in accounting. He owned a professional corporation (PC) called DEWPC that, since its inception, had elected to be taxed as an S corporation. Watson was its sole shareholder, employee, director, and officer, and was the only person to whom DEWPC distributed money during the years at issue. His $24,000 annual salary was documented in the corporate minutes. In selecting his salary, he did not look at what comparable businesses paid for similar services. For both years at issue, Watson received dividend distributions from DEWPC that totaled over $175,000 annually.
On Feb. 5, 2007, IRS assessed $48,519 in taxes, penalties, and interest against DEWPC for the eight calendar quarters of 2002 and 2003. It made these assessments after it determined that portions of the dividend distributions from DEWPC to Watson should have been characterized as wages paid to Watson that were subject to employment taxes. DEWPC later paid $4,063.93 toward these assessments and then filed a claim for refund of the payments. IRS denied the claim and DEWPC sued in district court.
Background. Employers are liable for FICA (Social Security) taxes on wages paid to their employees. (Code Sec. 3111) Fact Sheet 2008-25, August 2008 warns S corporations not to attempt to avoid paying employment taxes by having their officers treat their compensation as cash distributions, payments of personal expenses, and/or loans rather than as wages. Fact Sheet 2008-25, August 2008 lists these factors that courts have considered in determining reasonable compensation:
• training and experience;
• duties and responsibilities;
• time and effort devoted to the business;
• dividend history;
• payments to non-shareholder employees;
• timing and manner of paying bonuses to key people;
• what comparable businesses pay for similar services;
• compensation agreements; and
• use of a formula to determine compensation.
DEWPC argued that IRS did not have the authority to recharacterize any of the dividend payments as compensation. DEWPC cited three federal court cases to support its argument.
Court’s ruling. The district court found that DEWPC’s position was undermined by IRS revenue rulings and case law. For example, in Rev Rul 74-44, 1974-1 CB 287, IRS concluded that dividends received by an S corporation’s two sole shareholders were wages for which the corporation was liable for FICA, FUTA and income tax withholding. In Joseph Radtke v. U.S., (DC WI 4/11/89) 63 AFTR 2d 89-1469, aff’d, (CA 7 2/23/90) 65 AFTR 2d 90-1155, a district court determined that certain funds designated as dividends were actually compensation for which an S corporation owed employment taxes. The district court was not persuaded by the rulings that DEWPC cited because in those rulings, the taxpayer was attempting to recharacterize funds, whereas in DEPW’s case, it was the government that was attempting to recharacterize the funds.
The district court said that the proper tax treatment of funds disbursed by an S corporation to its employees or shareholders turns on an analysis of whether the payments were remuneration for services performed. After reviewing the facts, the court concluded that DEWPC structured Watson’s salary and dividend payments in an effort to avoid federal employment taxes, with full knowledge that the dividends paid to Watson were actually “remuneration for services performed.” The court believed that a reasonable person in Watson’s role as DEWPC’s sole shareholder, officer, and employee would be expected to earn far more than a $24,000 salary for his services. The court pointed out that Watson was an exceedingly qualified accountant, with both bachelor’s and advanced degrees, working as one of the primary earners in a reputable firm that had over $2 million in gross revenues in 2002 and nearly $3 million in 2003.
As a result of the ruling, DEWPC will owe employment taxes, penalties, and interest on the 2002 and 2003 dividend distributions to Watson that were reclassified as salary.
RIA Research References: For S corporation dividends as wages subject to withholding, see FTC 2d/FIN ¶ H-4329; TaxDesk ¶ 532,002.
Source: Federal Tax Updates on Checkpoint Newsstand tab 1/13/2011
Should you have questions regarding this post or any other tax needs, contact us at Schutte & Hilgendorf, PLLC, Prescott accountants serving the greater Yavapai County with tax, accounting, auditing, and QuickBooks consulting expertise.
The newly passed and signed 2010 Tax Act, formally named the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010, includes several provisions that will affect taxpayers. Here is the information you need to know now about this legislation.
Major Provisions
The new law
- postpones the sunset of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts;
- reduces the estate tax;
- extends unemployment benefits;
- includes an alternative minimum tax (AMT) patch;
- continues through 2012 the lower capital gains tax rate introduced by the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003; and
- extends for two years the repeal of the itemized deduction phase-out and the personal exemption phase-out.
Provisions That May Affect You
Estate Tax
The Act temporarily reinstates the estate tax, with an estate tax rate of 35% and an estate tax exemption of $5 million (adjusted for inflation after 2011).
Payroll Tax
For 2011, the Act reduces the rate for the Social Security portion of payroll taxes to 10.4% by reducing the employee rate from 6.2% to 4.2%. The employer’s portion remains 6.2%.
Family
The Act extends several expired or expiring provisions affecting families, including the following:
- The increased standard deduction for married taxpayers filing jointly, which is scheduled to expire after 2010, continues for two years.
- The $1,000 child tax credit amount continues for two years instead of reverting to $500.
- The increased starting and ending points for the earned income credit continues for two years.
- The $3,000 amount for the child and dependent care credit, which was scheduled to revert to $2,400 after 2010, continues for two years.
- The American Opportunity Tax Credit continues for two years.
Business
The Act extends the 100% bonus depreciation for business property acquired after September 8, 2010, before January 1, 2012, and placed in service before January 1, 2012 (or before January 1, 2013, in the case of certain property). It also sets the expensing limitation under IRC §179 at $125,000 and the phase-out threshold amount at $500,000 for 2012. The Act then reduces these amounts to $25,000 and $200,000 for tax years beginning after 2012.
The temporary 100% exclusion of gain from the sale of certain small business stock under IRC §1202, enacted by the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010, is extended through 2011.
AMT
The Act includes an AMT patch for 2010 and 2011.
- For 2010, the AMT exemption amounts will be $47,450 for unmarried individuals and $72,450 for married individuals filing jointly.
- For 2011, the amounts will be $48,450 and $74,450, respectively.
Needless to say, the 2010 Tax Act is still very new. It is only just being analyzed by professional advisers. The law is potentially subject to modifications by technical correction acts. In addition, provisions of the law may be interpreted by the Treasury Department issuing regulations and by the IRS issuing forms and instructions.
Should you have questions regarding this post or any other tax needs, contact us at Schutte & Hilgendorf, PLLC, Prescott accountants serving the greater Yavapai County with tax, accounting, auditing, and QuickBooks consulting expertise.
HOW-TO Choose A Good CPA and Relieve Year End Stress
What you do now: Wait until the day before your tax appointment and throw all your receipts in a box. You show up at the tax office stressed and worried.
With a Good CPA, you will: Meet with your CPA and talk about the weather and brag about your grandchildren because you are so prepared that you already know what you’ll owe and everything is organized. Schutte & Hilgendorf offers a full range of accounting and tax services during the year to avoid surprises. We provide you with tax strategies that you can implement BEFORE your taxes are due.
What you do now: “Wing it” -This means that you categorize 80% of your expenses for your business into “ASK ACCOUNTANT”.
With a Good CPA, you will: Call your CPA during the year as needed to get advice on categorizing your expense. Schutte & Hilgendorf can set up your chart of accounts and software to meet your unique businesses needs.
What you do now: Tell your tax preparer at your tax appointment that you bought a new truck for the business last year. When they ask you about your mileage log, you look at them with a blank stare and ask, ”What’s that?”.
With a Good CPA, you will: Be informed to contact them with any major business or personal purchases or changes as they happen. It is more cost effective to meeting with us a couple of times a year than to wait until the week your taxes are due.
What you do now: Call your tax preparer and wait for 8 days for a response.
With a Good CPA, you will: Receive a response to your phone call or email within 1 business day. At Schutte & Hilgendorf, we consider ourselves partners and trusted advisors to our clients. We are always available for our clients.
What you do now: You nod your head and smile when your tax preparer explains the new tax laws and the IRS code.
With a Good CPA, you will: Understand what your options for tax savings are because they explain it in an understandable manner. Schutte & Hilgendorf is your local accounting & tax firm providing straightforward and friendly advice.
What you do now: Find out about tax laws and strategies at tax time that could have saved you money if only you had known about them.
With a Good CPA, you will: Be informed of new laws as they happen and can make decisions that can save you tax dollars. At Schutte & Hilgendorf, we stay on top of developments around the nation that affect our clients. We maintain our website to provide up to the minute news and advice.
What you do now: On April 15, you say to your tax preparer as you walk out the door, Oh Yeah! I started a new business last year. Do I need to file a tax return?
With a Good CPA, you will: Have the advice you need when starting a new business. This includes what filings are required.
Schutte & Hilgendorf offers consulting services for choosing the right entity and starting up your new business. We also offer ongoing maintenance of your accounting records.
Schutte & Hilgendorf has 4 full time CPAs and specializes in providing audit, accounting, tax and consulting services for individuals, businesses, non·profit organizations, and homeowners associations.
From Prescott Newspapers, Inc.’s How-To Guide Article, September 2010.
WASHINGTON ― The Internal Revenue Service today released instructions to help employers implement the 2011 cut in payroll taxes, along with new income-tax withholding tables that employers will use during 2011.
Millions of workers will see their take-home pay rise during 2011 because the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 provides a two percentage point payroll tax cut for employees, reducing their Social Security tax withholding rate from 6.2 percent to 4.2 percent of wages paid. This reduced Social Security withholding will have no effect on the employee’s future Social Security benefits.
The new law also maintains the income-tax rates that have been in effect in recent years.
Employers should start using the new withholding tables and reducing the amount of Social Security tax withheld as soon as possible in 2011 but not later than Jan. 31, 2011. Notice 1036, released today, contains the percentage method income tax withholding tables, the lower Social Security withholding rate, and related information that most employers need to implement these changes. Publication 15, (Circular E), Employer’s Tax Guide, containing the extensive wage bracket tables that some employers use, will be available on IRS.gov in a few days.
The IRS recognizes that the late enactment of these changes makes it difficult for many employers to quickly update their withholding systems. For that reason, the agency asks employers to adjust their payroll systems as soon as possible, but not later than Jan. 31, 2011.
For any Social Security tax over withheld during January, employers should make an offsetting adjustment in workers’ pay as soon as possible but not later than March 31, 2011.
Employers and payroll companies will handle the withholding changes, so workers typically won’t need to take any additional action, such as filling out a new W-4 withholding form.
As always, however, the IRS urges workers to review their withholding every year and, if necessary, fill out a new W-4 and give it to their employer. For example, individuals and couples with multiple jobs, people who are having children, getting married, getting divorced or buying a home, and those who typically wind up with a balance due or large refund at the end of the year may want to consider submitting revised W-4 forms. Publication 919, How Do I Adjust My Tax Withholding?, provides more information to workers on making changes to their tax withholding.
From IRS Announcement IR-2010-124, Dec. 17, 2010
Should you have questions regarding this post or any other tax needs, contact us at Schutte & Hilgendorf, PLLC, Prescott accountants serving the greater Yavapai County with tax, accounting, auditing, and QuickBooks consulting expertise.
IRS Announces 2011 Standard Mileage Rates
|
|
| WASHINGTON — The Internal Revenue Service today issued the 2011 optional standard mileage rates used to calculate the deductible costs of operating an automobile for business, charitable, medical or moving purposes.
Beginning on Jan. 1, 2011, the standard mileage rates for the use of a car (also vans, pickups or panel trucks) will be:
- 51 cents per mile for business miles driven
- 19 cents per mile driven for medical or moving purposes
- 14 cents per mile driven in service of charitable organizations
A taxpayer may not use the business standard mileage rate for a vehicle after using any depreciation method under the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS) or after claiming a Section 179 deduction for that vehicle.
In addition, the business standard mileage rate cannot be used for more than four vehicles used simultaneously. The IRS is requesting public comments on whether taxpayers should be allowed to use the business standard mileage rate in this circumstance.
Beginning in 2011, a taxpayer may use the business standard mileage rate for vehicles used for hire, such as taxicabs.
Also beginning in 2011, the standard mileage rates are announced in a separate notice, which also provides the amount a taxpayer must use in calculating reductions to basis for depreciation taken under the business standard mileage rate and the maximum standard automobile cost for automobiles under a FAVR allowance. The IRS plans to discontinue publishing the standard mileage rate revenue procedure annually but will publish modifications as required.
Taxpayers always have the option of calculating the actual costs of using their vehicle rather than using the standard mileage rates.
Revenue Procedure 2010-51 and Notice 2010-88 contain additional details regarding the standard mileage rates.
From IRS Announcement IR-2010-119, December 3, 2010
Should you have questions regarding this post or any other tax needs, contact us at Schutte & Hilgendorf, PLLC, Prescott accountants serving the greater Yavapai County with tax, accounting, auditing, and QuickBooks consulting expertise. |
|
Arizona Department of Revenue has revised Arizona Form A-4 effective for wages paid after December 31, 2010. The changes include:
1) Providing an additional withholding percentage of 0.8%. Previously available percentages are unchanged.
2) Removing the $15,000 annual compensation threshold. All seven withholding percentage rates are available to all employees, regardless of annual compensation.
3) Relaxing the exemption requirements. The employee only has to expect that there will be no Arizona tax liability in the current taxable year (instead of not having a liability in the prior year and not expecting one in the current year). However, this withholding exemption election will need to be renewed annually, similar to federal requirements.
Unlike the changes that took effect on July 1, not every employee is required to complete a new Arizona Form A-4. Individuals with a current withholding percentage elected on Arizona Form A-4P or Arizona Form A-4V may file a new form to take advantage of the new withholding percentage. However, employees wanting to renew their withholding exemption or those wanting to take advantage of the lower withholding percentage are required to file a new Form A-4 with their employer.
Click here to download a new 2011 Arizona A-4.
Changes to Arizona Withholding for Wages Paid After December 31, 2010, Arizona Department of Revenue, December 7, 2010.
Should you have questions regarding this post or any other tax needs, contact us at Schutte & Hilgendorf, PLLC, Prescott accountants serving the greater Yavapai County with tax, accounting, auditing, and QuickBooks consulting expertise.
The Small Business Jobs Act of 2010, which passed Congress, Senate, and was signed by the President on September 27th, 2010, offers a variety of small business tax breaks, some revenue raisers, expands small business loan programs, strengthens small business preference programs for federal government projects, and provides incentives for exporters.
Small Business Tax Relief
- Section 179 depreciation has been increased to a maximum of $500,000 and the phaseout threshold has been increased to $2 million for 2010 and 2011.
- The first year 50% bonus depreciation has been extended to apply to property acquired and placed in service in 2010.
- Self employed individuals can deduct the cost of health insurance for themselves, spouses, and dependents when calculating self employment tax.
- The exclusion from gross income of gain from the sale or exchange of qualified small business stock acquired after the date of enactment and before January 1, 2011 has been increased to 100%.
- The carryback period for eligible small business credits under IRC § 38 is extended from one to five years. The bill also allows taxpayers to use eligible small business credits to offset both regular and alternative minimum tax liability.
- The deduction for trade or business startup expenses has been increased from $5,000 to $10,000 for tax years beginning in 2010 and 2011.
- The penalty for failure to disclose a reportable transaction has been limited to 75% of the decrease in tax resulting from the transaction.
- Cell phones have been removed from the definition of listed property.
Revenue Raisers
- Recipients of rental income from real estate are now generally subject to the same information reporting requirements as taxpayers engaged in a trade or business. In particular, rental income recipients making payments of $600 or more to a service provider (such as a plumber, painter or accountant) in the course of earning rental income are required to provide an information return (typically Form 1099-MISC) to the IRS and to the service provider. This provision will apply to payments made after Dec. 31, 2010.
- The penalties for failure to file a correct information return has also been increased.
- Rollovers from elective deferral plans are allowed to Roth-designated accounts.
- Participants in government section 457 plans are allowed to treat elective deferrals as Roth contributions, effective for tax years beginning after 2010.
Small Business Loans
- The bill creates a Small Business Lending Fund to address ongoing effects of the financial crisis on small businesses by allowing the Treasury Department to make capital investments in eligible financial institutions to increase credit available for small businesses. Independent community banks may participate in a new $30 billion lending fund on the condition they make loans to small businesses and meet other requirements. Financial institutions (bank and savings and loan holding companies, depository institutions, and community development loan funds) with $10 billion or less in total assets may apply for capital investments of up to 3% of risk-weighted assets.
Small Business Federal Contracts
- Federal agencies are called on to solicit bids from small businesses and federal contracting requirements are amended to encourage small businesses to bid for federal contracts.
- Federal agencies are required to solicit bids from any responsible source, including small business concerns, teams and joint ventures, for multiple award contracts above the substantial bundling threshold of the agency.
Small Business Exports
- The bill contains measures designed to encourage small businesses to become exporters or to increase their export activities. The SBA will create a pilot three-year trade and export promotion program that will make grants to states to carry out export programs that assist eligible small businesses.
(From Journal of Accountancy article Small Business Stimulus Passes Congress, September 23, 2010)
Should you have questions regarding this post or any other tax needs, contact us at Schutte & Hilgendorf, PLLC, Prescott accountants serving the greater Yavapai County with tax, accounting, auditing, and QuickBooks consulting expertise.
Notice 2010-59, 2010-39 IRB; Rev Rul 2010-23, 2010-39 IRB; IR 2010-95; IRS’s OTC FAQs
In Notice 2010-59, IRS has provided guidance on new Code Sec. 106(f) added by Sec. 9003 of the Affordable Care Act (P.L. 111-148, 3/23/2010), which, effective Jan. 1, 2011, provides that unless prescribed or insulin, the cost of over-the-counter medicines cannot be reimbursed from flexible spending arrangements (FSA), health reimbursement arrangements (HRA), Health Savings Accounts (HSA) and Archer Medical Savings Accounts (Archer MSA). IRS has also issued a Revenue Ruling, Information Release, and Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on this provision.
Background.
Under Code Sec. 213, expenses for medical care, not compensated for by insurance or otherwise, may be claimed as an itemized deduction to the extent they exceed 7.5% of adjusted gross income (AGI). (For tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2012, medical expenses will be deductible to the extent they exceed 10% of AGI.) Medical care generally is defined broadly as amounts paid for diagnoses, cure, mitigation, treatment or prevention of disease, or for the purpose of affecting any structure of the body. However, any amount paid during a tax year for medicine or drugs is explicitly deductible as a medical expense only if it is a prescribed drug or is insulin. Thus, any amount paid for non-prescription medicine is not deductible as a medical expense, including any medicine recommended by a physician.
However, the general definition of medical care without the explicit limitation on medicine applies for the exclusion for employer-provided health coverage and medical care. Thus, under an HRA or under a health FSA, amounts paid for prescription and over-the-counter medicine are treated as medical expenses, and reimbursements for these amounts are excludible from gross income. Similar rules apply for a HSA and Archer MSA.
The Affordable Care Act provides that the definition of medical expense for purposes of employer-provided health coverage, including HRAs, health FSAs), HSAs, and Archer MSAs, is conformed to the definition for purposes of the itemized deduction for medical expenses, except that a prescribed drug is determined without regard to whether it is available without a prescription. The changed definition for HSAs and Archer MSAs applies for amounts paid with respect to tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2010. The changed definition for health FSAs and HRAs applies for expenses incurred with respect to tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2010. (Code Sec. 106(f), Code Sec. 220(d)(2)(A), and Code Sec. 223(d)(2)(A), as amended by Affordable Care Act Sec. 9003) Thus, under the provision, the cost of over-the-counter medicines can’t be reimbursed with excludible income through a health FSA, HRA, HSA, or Archer MSA, unless the medicine is insulin or prescribed by a doctor.
New guidance.
Notice 2010-59 explains that under Code Sec. 106(f), Code Sec. 220(d)(2)(A), and Code Sec. 223(d)(2)(A), an individual may be reimbursed for over-the counter medicines or drugs, so long as the individual obtains a prescription for the medicines or drugs. A prescription means a written or electronic order for a medicine or drug that meets the legal requirements of a prescription in the state in which the medical expense is incurred and that is issued by an individual who is legally authorized to issue a prescription in that state. The rules in Code Sec. 106(f), Code Sec. 220(d)(2)(A), and Code Sec. 223(d)(2)(A) do not apply to items that aren’t medicines or drugs, including equipment such as crutches, supplies such as bandages, and diagnostic devices such as blood sugar test kits. These items may qualify as medical care if they otherwise meet the definition of medical care in Code Sec. 213(d)(1).
Effective date.
Notice 2010-59 provides that for expenses incurred after Dec. 31, 2010, payments or reimbursements for medicines or drugs from an employer-provided accident and health plan, including a health FSA or an HRA, are restricted to prescribed drugs, insulin, and over-the-counter drugs that are prescribed. This effective date applies regardless of whether the plan year for the employer’s plan is a fiscal or calendar year or whether there is no plan year (or other coverage period in the case of an HRA), and regardless of any applicable grace period for a health FSA (as provided in Prop Reg § 1.125-1(e)). Tax-free distributions for qualified medical expenses from an HSA or Archer MSA for medicines or drugs purchased after Dec. 31, 2010, are restricted to prescribed drugs, insulin, and over-the-counter medicines or drugs that are prescribed.
Thus, expenses incurred for over-the-counter medicines or drugs purchased without a prescription before Jan. 1, 2011 may be reimbursed tax-free at any time by an employer-provided plan, including an FSA or HRA, pursuant to the terms of the employer’s plan. This new law change doesn’t affect HSA or Archer MSA distributions for medicines or drugs made before Jan. 1, 2011, nor does it affect distributions made after Dec. 31, 2010, for medicines or drugs purchased on or before that date.
Debit cards.
Current health FSA or HRA debit card systems are not capable of substantiating Code Sec. 106(f) compliance with respect to over-the-counter medicines or drugs because the systems are incapable of recognizing and substantiating that the medicines or drugs were prescribed. Accordingly, except as provided below, for expenses incurred on and after Jan. 1, 2011, health FSA and HRA debit cards may not be used to purchase over-the-counter medicines or drugs.
Notice 2010-59 provides that to facilitate the significant changes to existing systems to reflect Code Sec. 106(f) ‘s change, IRS will not challenge the use of health FSA and HRA debit cards for expenses incurred through Jan. 15, 2011 if the use of the debit cards complies with the existing guidance. But, on and after Jan. 16, 2011, over-the-counter medicine or drug purchases at all providers and merchants (whether or not they have an inventory information approval system (IIAS)) must be substantiated before reimbursement may be made.
Substantiation can be done by submitting the prescription (or a copy of the prescription or other documentation that a prescription has been issued) for the over-the-counter medicine or drug, and other information from an independent third party that satisfies the requirements under Prop Reg § 1.125-6(b)(3)(i). For example, a customer receipt issued by a pharmacy which identifies the name of the purchaser (or the name of the person for whom the prescription applies), the date and amount of the purchase and an Rx number satisfies the substantiation requirements for over-the-counter medicines or drugs, as does a receipt without an Rx number accompanied by a copy of the related prescription.
Under Notice 2007-2, health FSA and HRA debit cards may be used at a pharmacy that does not have an IIAS if 90% of the store’s gross receipts during the prior tax year consists of items which qualify as expenses for medical care under Code Sec. 213(d). Until further guidance is issued, debit cards may be used at a pharmacy that satisfies the 90% test in Notice 2007-2, 2007-1 CB 254 , to purchase over-the-counter medicines or drugs that have been prescribed, if substantiation is properly submitted, in accordance with the terms of the plan, including the prescription (or a copy of the prescription or other documentation that a prescription has been issued) and other information from an independent third party that satisfies the requirements under Prop Reg § 1.125-6(b)(3)(i) . Solely for the purpose of determining whether a pharmacy meets this 90-percent test, sales of over-the-counter medicines and drugs at the pharmacy may continue to be taken into account after Dec. 31, 2010.
Cafeteria plans.
Notice 2010-59 provides that, notwithstanding the rule against retroactive amendments to cafeteria plans, an amendment to conform a cafeteria plan to the requirements set out in Notice 2010-59 that is adopted no later than June 30, 2011, may be made effective retroactively for expenses incurred after Dec. 31, 2010 (or after Jan. 15, 2011 for health FSA and HRA debit card purchases).
Effect on other documents.
Notice 2010-59 provides that IRS intends to amend Reg. § 1.105-1, Reg. § 1.105-2, Reg. § 1.106-1, Reg. § 1.125-1 and Reg. § 1.125-5 to provide for the new definition of medical expenses. Taxpayers may rely on Notice 2010-59 until the amended regs are issued. In addition, Rev Rul 2010-23 obsoletes Rev Rul 2003-102, 2003-2 CB 559 , which provides that reimbursements by an employer of amounts expended for medicines or drugs available without a prescription are excludable from gross income Code Sec. 105(b).
IR 2010-95 can be viewed on the IRS website at http://www.irs.gov/irs/article/0,,id=227301,00.html.
The text of IRS’s OTC (Over-The-Counter) FAQs can be viewed on the IRS website at http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=227308,00.html.
RIA Research References: For expenditures that qualify as medical care expenses, see FTC 2d/FIN ¶ K-2100; United States Tax Reporter ¶ 2134.04; TaxDesk ¶ 346,003.
Source: Federal Tax Updates on Checkpoint Newsstand tab 9/7/2010 (as provided by kipp.mitchell@thomsonreuter.com)
Contact Schutte & Hilgendorf, PLLC with questions related to over-the-counter medicines and their tax treatment or with any other tax and accounting questions. Schutte & Hilgendorf is a CPA firm in Prescott, Arizona offering tax, accounting, auditing, and consulting services to individuals and business in the greater Yavapai county.
Misclassifying Workers as Independent Contractors Can Be A Costly Mistake
Using independent contractors in your business can save money. Independent contractors do not receive typical company benefits such as vacation, sick pay or health insurance/retirement benefits. Plus, employers don’t pay social security taxes (FICA), or provide unemployment benefits. However, it is easy to blur the line between a true independent contractor and employee and the IRS is cracking down.
In order to be considered an independent contractor, a worker should meet certain criteria. Control is one of the primary determinators. What is your level of control over the worker? An independent contractor determines how and when work will be performed whereas an employee’s work parameters are established by the employer. For example, if you require a worker to attend regular meetings, work set hours and use specific materials and equipment, then in most cases that worker is an employee because you are exercising significant control over his/her job performance.
Other factors include such things as:
- Working relationship. Does the worker have other clients with whom he works or does he work exclusively for you? An independent contractor is in business for himself so he should have other clients or at least be in the market to acquire other business opportunities.
- Work hours. An independent contractor should, in most cases be able to set his own work schedule. As long as the contractor meets the deadline established by the client, he can decide his own work schedule.
- Work location. Generally, an independent contractor provides for his own work location, materials and equipment. In other words, his primary office is not located at your company’s facility.
- Expenses. Employees typically submit their work-related expenses to their employer for reimbursement. An independent contractor, however, generally absorbs expenses as part of the cost of doing business.
- Taxes. An independent contractor pays his own taxes by filing quarterly estimated tax returns. Your company does not withhold taxes.
If the IRS determines you have misclassified a worker as an independent contractor rather than an employee, get out your checkbook. You may be charged for back taxes, interest and penalties. In fact, there is even the possibility of criminal charges. And in some cases the misclassified worker has been able to sue the employer for lost benefits during the time in which he should have been considered an employee.
The IRS has a set of guidelines an employer can use to determine the proper status of a worker. If you are still uncertain, give us a call us.
While in the short-term, using independent contractors in your business may save you money, it could cost you significantly more in the long-term. Make sure you make the right choice.
(From business.gov article Misclassifying Workers as Independent Contractors Can Be Costly)
Should you have questions regarding this post or any other tax needs, contact us at Schutte & Hilgendorf, PLLC, Prescott accountants serving the greater Yavapai County with tax, accounting, auditing, and QuickBooks consulting expertise.
On July 1, 2010 the Arizona withholding rates will change. They are currently based on a percentage of the Federal withholding. Starting on July 1, 2010 the rates will change to being based on a table prescribed by the Arizona Department of Revenue. The rates effective July 1, 2010 have recently been issued along with the new Form A-4. This form will need to be completed by employees prior to the change on July 1, 2010.
The tax rate did not increase – Arizona is now using a different method for calculating withholding
The following table can be used as a guide for determining your new rate:
If your rate
Before July 1 was |
|
Then use this rate
After June 30 |
| 10.7% |
|
1.3% |
| 20.3% |
|
1.8% |
| 24.5% |
|
2.7% |
| 26.7% |
|
3.6% |
| 33.1% |
|
4.2% |
| 39.5% |
|
5.1% |
Should you have questions regarding this post or any other tax needs, contact us at Schutte & Hilgendorf, PLLC, Prescott accountants serving the greater Yavapai County with tax, accounting, auditing, and QuickBooks consulting expertise.
|
We Are The Piece That Fits.
Schutte & Hilgendorf PLLC
3140 Stillwater Drive
Prescott, AZ 86305
Phone: 928-778-0079
Fax: 928-778-0261
|